Now less than two months since those catastrophes, as a number of wildfires rage in California, the administration is still reluctant to even use the phrase
. But that hasn’t stopped the EPA from all the while working to roll back a marquee Obama-era regulation meant to curb carbon emissions.
Tuesday plans to rescind the Clean Power Plan
in its totality while providing no alternative, arguing the rule doesn’t have a legal basis. The rule was meant to limit carbon emissions from power plants by requiring states to meet specific carbon emission reduction standards based on their individual energy consumption. It also includes an incentive program for states to get a head start on meeting standards on early deployment of renewable energy and low-income energy efficiency.
Under President Barack Obama, the EPA estimated the Clean Power Plan could prevent 2,700 to 6,600 premature deaths and 140,000 to 150,000 asthma attacks in children.
But the EPA’s newest proposal stops short of changing or creating an additional rule on the regulation of greenhouse gases and doesn’t acknowledge other human health risks tied to rising climates including the increasing likelihood and intensity of storms.
“It’s been clear to me that now has to be the time to talk about climate change, that’s pretty clear,” Gina McCarthy, former EPA administrator under Barack Obama, told CNN. “If people are actually losing their lives, their property, their sense of security because of severe weather events that we know are tied to changing climate, if (Pruitt) is sitting in his office and still writing this, clearly this proposal reflects that he’s not engaging with career staff in a robust way.”
McCarthy said that the reversal of the rule, which she played a large part in crafting, shows that the Trump administration is “just making it up as they go along.”
Abigail Dillen, vice president of climate and energy litigation at Earthjustice, said not acknowledging natural disasters is a clear omission.
“If now isn’t a good time to think about climate change, my question is when?” said Dillen, who is based in San Francisco and close to the Napa Valley fires. “I’m looking out my window and it’s so smoky from the fire.”
Liz Bowman, EPA spokeswoman, told CNN that the decision to halt the Obama-era plan is “about President Trump’s America First strategy.” She additionally referenced McCarthy by name.
“While the previous administration characterized the CPP as the solution to climate change, even former administrator McCarthy didn’t dispute that the rule would only reduce atmospheric concentrations of CO2 by 0.2% by 2100, or said another way, reduce sea level rise by 1/100th of an inch (essentially two sheets of paper thick),” Bowman said.
Bowman declined to answer questions relating to the agency avoiding reference to climate change or the current California wildfires.
Speaking on Fox News Tuesday night, Pruitt said the repeal was part of President Donald Trump’s promise “that the EPA would not be an agency that picks winners and losers,” adding that with the end of Obama-era plan “the war on coal is over.”
“For anyone to advance a notion that we should do away with all fossil fuels in the generation of electricity is simply not thinking correctly,” Pruitt said.
Members of Congress were also quick to challenge EPA’s decision to repeal CPP.
Democratic Sen. Cory Booker said in a statement Tuesday evening that the decision “is anything but surprising coming from an administration that thinks climate change is a hoax.”
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York, referenced natural disasters Tuesday saying, “at a time when Americans are experiencing extreme and dangerous weather more frequently than ever before, the last thing we should do is roll back actions to combat climate change.”